Immigrants from El Salvador vs Czech Median Family Income
COMPARE
Immigrants from El Salvador
Czech
Median Family Income
Median Family Income Comparison
Immigrants from El Salvador
Czechs
$92,545
MEDIAN FAMILY INCOME
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
252nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
$105,839
MEDIAN FAMILY INCOME
83.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Czech Median Family Income Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,645,519 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador and median family income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.165 and weighted average of $92,545. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,215,939 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs and median family income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.224 and weighted average of $105,839, a difference of 14.4%.
Median Family Income Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from El Salvador | Czech |
Minimum | $42,420 | $43,750 |
Maximum | $127,446 | $130,730 |
Range | $85,026 | $86,980 |
Mean | $90,153 | $89,458 |
Median | $92,338 | $90,621 |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | $78,680 | $79,002 |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | $101,462 | $98,480 |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | $22,782 | $19,478 |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | $16,234 | $15,413 |
Standard Deviation (Population) | $16,143 | $15,350 |
Similar Demographics by Median Family Income
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from El Salvador by Median Family Income
In terms of median family income, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from El Salvador are Immigrants from Guyana ($92,513, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Somalia ($92,609, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Barbados ($92,419, a difference of 0.14%), West Indian ($92,765, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Ecuador ($92,837, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Median Family Income |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 1.0 /100 | #245 | Tragic $93,593 |
Guyanese | 0.9 /100 | #246 | Tragic $93,373 |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.7 /100 | #247 | Tragic $92,912 |
French American Indians | 0.7 /100 | #248 | Tragic $92,872 |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.7 /100 | #249 | Tragic $92,837 |
West Indians | 0.6 /100 | #250 | Tragic $92,765 |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.6 /100 | #251 | Tragic $92,609 |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.6 /100 | #252 | Tragic $92,545 |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.6 /100 | #253 | Tragic $92,513 |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.5 /100 | #254 | Tragic $92,419 |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.5 /100 | #255 | Tragic $92,239 |
Nicaraguans | 0.5 /100 | #256 | Tragic $92,231 |
Americans | 0.4 /100 | #257 | Tragic $92,096 |
Osage | 0.4 /100 | #258 | Tragic $91,926 |
Cape Verdeans | 0.4 /100 | #259 | Tragic $91,848 |
Demographics Similar to Czechs by Median Family Income
In terms of median family income, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Danish ($105,900, a difference of 0.060%), Tongan ($105,967, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Morocco ($105,964, a difference of 0.12%), Slovene ($106,020, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Chile ($105,655, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Median Family Income |
Luxembourgers | 85.7 /100 | #139 | Excellent $106,183 |
Norwegians | 85.5 /100 | #140 | Excellent $106,144 |
Immigrants | Syria | 85.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent $106,118 |
Slovenes | 84.7 /100 | #142 | Excellent $106,020 |
Tongans | 84.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent $105,967 |
Immigrants | Morocco | 84.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent $105,964 |
Danes | 83.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent $105,900 |
Czechs | 83.4 /100 | #146 | Excellent $105,839 |
Immigrants | Chile | 82.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent $105,655 |
Hungarians | 81.7 /100 | #148 | Excellent $105,609 |
Immigrants | Germany | 80.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent $105,507 |
Irish | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent $105,453 |
Peruvians | 80.4 /100 | #151 | Excellent $105,444 |
Immigrants | Albania | 79.1 /100 | #152 | Good $105,285 |
Slavs | 77.9 /100 | #153 | Good $105,144 |