West Indian vs Yugoslavian Family Households
COMPARE
West Indian
Yugoslavian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
West Indians
Yugoslavians
63.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
275th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
West Indian vs Yugoslavian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,859,677 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of West Indians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.114 and weighted average of 63.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,640,029 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.003 and weighted average of 63.1%, a difference of 0.050%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | West Indian | Yugoslavian |
| Minimum | 47.0% | 34.1% |
| Maximum | 83.0% | 87.5% |
| Range | 36.0% | 53.4% |
| Mean | 66.5% | 61.6% |
| Median | 65.3% | 62.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.3% | 57.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 73.3% | 65.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.0% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 9.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 9.4% |
Demographics Similar to West Indians and Yugoslavians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to West Indians are Lumbee (63.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (63.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Serbian (63.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Croatia (63.1%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Turkey (63.1%, a difference of 0.020%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Singapore (63.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Austria (63.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Croatia (63.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Turkey (63.1%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (63.1%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 0.6 /100 | #262 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Cheyenne | 0.5 /100 | #263 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Kenyans | 0.5 /100 | #264 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Colville | 0.5 /100 | #265 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.5 /100 | #266 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Israelis | 0.4 /100 | #267 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 0.4 /100 | #268 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Yugoslavians | 0.4 /100 | #269 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 0.3 /100 | #270 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 0.3 /100 | #271 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 0.3 /100 | #272 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 0.3 /100 | #273 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.3 /100 | #274 | Tragic 63.1% |
| West Indians | 0.3 /100 | #275 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Serbians | 0.3 /100 | #276 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Ottawa | 0.3 /100 | #277 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 0.2 /100 | #278 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.2 /100 | #279 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 0.2 /100 | #280 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Estonians | 0.2 /100 | #281 | Tragic 62.9% |
| New Zealanders | 0.1 /100 | #282 | Tragic 62.9% |