Sierra Leonean vs Immigrants from Eastern Africa Married-couple Households

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,352,562 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Sierra Leoneans and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.310 and weighted average of 42.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 354,884,071 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Africa and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.427 and weighted average of 42.9%, a difference of 0.14%.

Married-couple Households Correlation Summary

Measurement	Sierra Leonean	Immigrants from Eastern Africa
Minimum	10.1%	15.8%
Maximum	73.4%	80.4%
Range	63.3%	64.5%
Mean	45.2%	43.7%
Median	44.4%	42.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	37.7%	37.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	53.1%	46.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	15.4%	9.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	12.2%	11.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	12.1%	11.7%

Demographics Similar to Sierra Leoneans and Immigrants from Eastern Africa by Married-couple Households

In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Sierra Leoneans are Immigrants from Africa (42.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ecuador (42.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Guatemala (42.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (43.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Bangladesh (43.1%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Africa are Immigrants from Africa (42.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Ecuador (42.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (43.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Guatemala (42.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Bangladesh (43.1%, a difference of 0.37%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-couple Households
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	0.1 /100 \| #268	Tragic 43.4%
Immigrants \| Sierra Leone	0.1 /100 \| #269	Tragic 43.3%
Yuman	0.1 /100 \| #270	Tragic 43.3%
Guatemalans	0.1 /100 \| #271	Tragic 43.3%
Immigrants \| Nigeria	0.1 /100 \| #272	Tragic 43.2%
Ethiopians	0.1 /100 \| #273	Tragic 43.2%
Nigerians	0.1 /100 \| #274	Tragic 43.2%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.0 /100 \| #275	Tragic 43.1%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	0.0 /100 \| #276	Tragic 43.1%
Immigrants \| Eastern Africa	0.0 /100 \| #277	Tragic 42.9%
Immigrants \| Africa	0.0 /100 \| #278	Tragic 42.9%
Sierra Leoneans	0.0 /100 \| #279	Tragic 42.9%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.0 /100 \| #280	Tragic 42.9%
Immigrants \| Guatemala	0.0 /100 \| #281	Tragic 42.8%
Bermudans	0.0 /100 \| #282	Tragic 42.4%
Inupiat	0.0 /100 \| #283	Tragic 42.4%
Cheyenne	0.0 /100 \| #284	Tragic 42.3%
Ghanaians	0.0 /100 \| #285	Tragic 42.2%
Belizeans	0.0 /100 \| #286	Tragic 42.2%
Chippewa	0.0 /100 \| #287	Tragic 42.1%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	0.0 /100 \| #288	Tragic 42.1%