Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Births to Unmarried Women

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,475,949 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.676 and weighted average of 35.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,338,343 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.077 and weighted average of 36.3%, a difference of 1.5%.

Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary

Measurement	Mexican American Indian	Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Minimum	13.9%	6.1%
Maximum	100.0%	78.7%
Range	86.1%	72.6%
Mean	57.1%	40.3%
Median	41.5%	39.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	36.9%	33.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	89.8%	46.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	52.9%	13.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	27.6%	13.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	27.2%	13.7%

Demographics Similar to Mexican American Indians and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago by Births to Unmarried Women

In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Immigrants from Western Africa (36.0%, a difference of 0.57%), Bermudan (35.5%, a difference of 0.61%), Nonimmigrants (35.5%, a difference of 0.62%), Salvadoran (36.0%, a difference of 0.69%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (35.4%, a difference of 0.96%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago are Chickasaw (36.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Grenada (36.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Potawatomi (36.2%, a difference of 0.14%), American (36.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Portugal (36.2%, a difference of 0.36%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Births to Unmarried Women
Japanese	0.9 /100 \| #243	Tragic 35.2%
Guyanese	0.9 /100 \| #244	Tragic 35.2%
Shoshone	0.8 /100 \| #245	Tragic 35.3%
Nigerians	0.7 /100 \| #246	Tragic 35.3%
Immigrants \| Nigeria	0.7 /100 \| #247	Tragic 35.4%
Immigrants \| Nonimmigrants	0.6 /100 \| #248	Tragic 35.5%
Bermudans	0.6 /100 \| #249	Tragic 35.5%
Mexican American Indians	0.4 /100 \| #250	Tragic 35.7%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	0.3 /100 \| #251	Tragic 36.0%
Salvadorans	0.3 /100 \| #252	Tragic 36.0%
Immigrants \| Portugal	0.2 /100 \| #253	Tragic 36.2%
Potawatomi	0.2 /100 \| #254	Tragic 36.2%
Chickasaw	0.2 /100 \| #255	Tragic 36.3%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	0.2 /100 \| #256	Tragic 36.3%
Immigrants \| Grenada	0.2 /100 \| #257	Tragic 36.3%
Americans	0.2 /100 \| #258	Tragic 36.4%
Immigrants \| El Salvador	0.2 /100 \| #259	Tragic 36.4%
Ottawa	0.2 /100 \| #260	Tragic 36.5%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.2 /100 \| #261	Tragic 36.5%
French American Indians	0.1 /100 \| #262	Tragic 36.6%
Nicaraguans	0.1 /100 \| #263	Tragic 36.6%