Immigrants from Oceania vs Central American Indian Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,304,848 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.348 and weighted average of 28.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,008,789 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.332 and weighted average of 27.9%, a difference of 0.67%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Oceania	Central American Indian
Minimum	17.3%	9.0%
Maximum	39.5%	56.2%
Range	22.2%	47.2%
Mean	29.5%	27.1%
Median	28.9%	28.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	24.7%	20.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	34.3%	31.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	9.6%	10.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.8%	9.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.7%	8.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and Central American Indians by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from the Azores (28.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Indonesian (28.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (28.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Palestinian (28.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Sioux (28.1%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Immigrants from Malaysia (27.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Pakistani (27.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Zimbabwean (27.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Africa (28.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and South American Indian (28.0%, a difference of 0.15%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Immigrants \| Azores	98.8 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 28.1%
Indonesians	98.8 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| Oceania	98.8 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 28.1%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	98.7 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 28.1%
Palestinians	98.5 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 28.1%
Sioux	98.3 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 28.1%
Choctaw	98.3 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| South America	98.0 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Uganda	97.7 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	97.7 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 28.0%
Tohono O'odham	97.6 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 28.0%
Spaniards	97.4 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 28.0%
Scandinavians	97.1 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	97.0 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 28.0%
Arabs	97.0 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 28.0%
South American Indians	96.9 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Africa	96.8 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 28.0%
Pakistanis	96.0 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	95.9 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 27.9%
Central American Indians	95.9 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 27.9%
Zimbabweans	95.6 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 27.9%