Immigrants from Singapore vs Central American Indian Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,406,161 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Singapore and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.465 and weighted average of 27.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,008,789 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.332 and weighted average of 27.9%, a difference of 0.47%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Singapore	Central American Indian
Minimum	6.8%	9.0%
Maximum	55.5%	56.2%
Range	48.7%	47.2%
Mean	26.7%	27.1%
Median	27.6%	28.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	23.8%	20.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	30.4%	31.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.6%	10.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	9.6%	9.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	9.5%	8.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Singapore and Central American Indians by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Singapore are Ecuadorian (27.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (27.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Belizean (27.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (27.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and Syrian (27.8%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Immigrants from Malaysia (27.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Pakistani (27.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Zimbabwean (27.9%, a difference of 0.040%), European (27.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Africa (28.0%, a difference of 0.14%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Scandinavians	97.1 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	97.0 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 28.0%
Arabs	97.0 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 28.0%
South American Indians	96.9 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Africa	96.8 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 28.0%
Pakistanis	96.0 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	95.9 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 27.9%
Central American Indians	95.9 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 27.9%
Zimbabweans	95.6 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 27.9%
Europeans	95.4 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Western Asia	93.6 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	92.8 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 27.8%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	91.8 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 27.8%
Immigrants \| Singapore	90.8 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 27.8%
Ecuadorians	90.8 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 27.8%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	90.5 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 27.8%
Belizeans	90.0 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 27.8%
Syrians	89.7 /100 \| #128	Excellent 27.8%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	89.4 /100 \| #129	Excellent 27.8%
Cajuns	87.6 /100 \| #130	Excellent 27.7%
Lebanese	87.4 /100 \| #131	Excellent 27.7%