Immigrants from Italy vs Hmong Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Italy
Hmong
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Italy
Hmong
64.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
90.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
130th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Italy vs Hmong Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 324,146,705 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.007 and weighted average of 64.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,604,422 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.098 and weighted average of 64.9%, a difference of 0.14%.

Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Italy | Hmong |
Minimum | 43.1% | 42.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 82.3% |
Range | 56.9% | 39.5% |
Mean | 67.9% | 64.2% |
Median | 68.1% | 63.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.9% | 60.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 74.7% | 67.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.7% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Italy and Hmong by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Italy are Nonimmigrants (64.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Cajun (64.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Belizean (64.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ecuador (64.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Panama (64.8%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Choctaw (64.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Argentina (64.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Belize (64.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (64.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Oceania (64.9%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Iraq | 95.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Cherokee | 95.3 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Dutch | 95.1 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 94.2 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Hungarians | 94.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Hmong | 93.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Choctaw | 93.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 92.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Immigrants | Belize | 92.7 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Panamanians | 92.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Italians | 91.9 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 91.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Immigrants | Italy | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 90.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Cajuns | 89.4 /100 | #132 | Excellent 64.8% |
Belizeans | 89.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 64.8% |
Greeks | 88.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 64.7% |
Maltese | 87.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | China | 86.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 64.7% |