Cajun vs Hmong Family Households
COMPARE
Cajun
Hmong
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Cajuns
Hmong
64.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
89.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cajun vs Hmong Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,695,707 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.362 and weighted average of 64.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,604,422 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.098 and weighted average of 64.9%, a difference of 0.17%.
![Cajun vs Hmong Family Households](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/family-households/cajuns-vs-hmong-family-households-chart.webp)
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cajun | Hmong |
Minimum | 47.6% | 42.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 82.3% |
Range | 52.4% | 39.5% |
Mean | 67.3% | 64.2% |
Median | 67.2% | 63.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.6% | 60.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.7% | 67.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.1% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.6% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Cajuns and Hmong by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Belizean (64.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Nonimmigrants (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Italy (64.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Greek (64.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and Maltese (64.7%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Choctaw (64.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Argentina (64.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Belize (64.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (64.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Oceania (64.9%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Cherokee | 95.3 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Dutch | 95.1 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 94.2 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Hungarians | 94.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Hmong | 93.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Choctaw | 93.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 92.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Immigrants | Belize | 92.7 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Panamanians | 92.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Italians | 91.9 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 91.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Immigrants | Italy | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 90.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Cajuns | 89.4 /100 | #132 | Excellent 64.8% |
Belizeans | 89.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 64.8% |
Greeks | 88.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 64.7% |
Maltese | 87.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | China | 86.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 86.4 /100 | #137 | Excellent 64.7% |