Immigrants from Australia vs Thai Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Immigrants from Australia
Thai
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Immigrants from Australia
Thais
26.6%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
24.0%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Australia vs Thai Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,724,917 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.641 and weighted average of 26.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 438,559,293 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Thais and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003 and weighted average of 24.0%, a difference of 10.8%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Australia | Thai |
| Minimum | 3.9% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 71.3% |
| Range | 96.1% | 69.4% |
| Mean | 41.7% | 19.2% |
| Median | 32.7% | 18.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.4% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.4% | 23.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 27.0% | 11.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.8% | 12.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 28.4% | 11.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia and Thais by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Cambodian (26.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Japan (26.4%, a difference of 0.79%), Burmese (26.4%, a difference of 0.98%), Soviet Union (26.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and Immigrants from Korea (26.3%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Immigrants from Iran (24.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (23.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Immigrants from China (24.7%, a difference of 2.7%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (24.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (25.0%, a difference of 4.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 24.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 24.0% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 24.7% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 24.7% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 25.0% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 25.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 25.3% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 25.6% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 25.6% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 25.8% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 26.1% |
| Armenians | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 26.2% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 26.3% |
| Soviet Union | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 26.3% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 26.4% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 26.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 26.6% |
| Cambodians | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 26.7% |