Immigrants from Africa vs Pakistani Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 468,727,064 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.319 and weighted average of 28.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 335,080,458 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.237 and weighted average of 27.9%, a difference of 0.13%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Africa	Pakistani
Minimum	12.2%	1.7%
Maximum	55.1%	66.6%
Range	42.9%	64.9%
Mean	30.1%	27.1%
Median	28.3%	27.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	26.5%	21.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	31.4%	30.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.9%	9.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.0%	9.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.9%	9.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Africa and Pakistanis by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Africa are South American Indian (28.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Arab (28.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (28.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Scandinavian (28.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Spaniard (28.0%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Immigrants from Malaysia (27.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Central American Indian (27.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Zimbabwean (27.9%, a difference of 0.050%), European (27.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and South American Indian (28.0%, a difference of 0.14%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Choctaw	98.3 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| South America	98.0 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Uganda	97.7 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	97.7 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 28.0%
Tohono O'odham	97.6 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 28.0%
Spaniards	97.4 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 28.0%
Scandinavians	97.1 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	97.0 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 28.0%
Arabs	97.0 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 28.0%
South American Indians	96.9 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Africa	96.8 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 28.0%
Pakistanis	96.0 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	95.9 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 27.9%
Central American Indians	95.9 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 27.9%
Zimbabweans	95.6 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 27.9%
Europeans	95.4 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Western Asia	93.6 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	92.8 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 27.8%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	91.8 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 27.8%
Immigrants \| Singapore	90.8 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 27.8%
Ecuadorians	90.8 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 27.8%