Immigrants from Africa vs Cajun Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 468,727,064 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.319 and weighted average of 28.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,693,835 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.618 and weighted average of 27.7%, a difference of 0.79%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Africa	Cajun
Minimum	12.2%	6.8%
Maximum	55.1%	100.0%
Range	42.9%	93.2%
Mean	30.1%	28.1%
Median	28.3%	27.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	26.5%	24.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	31.4%	31.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.9%	6.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.0%	10.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.9%	10.7%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Africa and Cajuns by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Africa are South American Indian (28.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Arab (28.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (28.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Pakistani (27.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (27.9%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Lebanese (27.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eritrea (27.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Belize (27.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Syrian (27.8%, a difference of 0.11%), and Belizean (27.8%, a difference of 0.13%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	97.0 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 28.0%
Arabs	97.0 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 28.0%
South American Indians	96.9 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Africa	96.8 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 28.0%
Pakistanis	96.0 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	95.9 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 27.9%
Central American Indians	95.9 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 27.9%
Zimbabweans	95.6 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 27.9%
Europeans	95.4 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Western Asia	93.6 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	92.8 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 27.8%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	91.8 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 27.8%
Immigrants \| Singapore	90.8 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 27.8%
Ecuadorians	90.8 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 27.8%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	90.5 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 27.8%
Belizeans	90.0 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 27.8%
Syrians	89.7 /100 \| #128	Excellent 27.8%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	89.4 /100 \| #129	Excellent 27.8%
Cajuns	87.6 /100 \| #130	Excellent 27.7%
Lebanese	87.4 /100 \| #131	Excellent 27.7%
Immigrants \| Belize	85.7 /100 \| #132	Excellent 27.7%