Immigrants from Africa vs Chilean Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 468,727,064 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.319 and weighted average of 28.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,524,763 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.251 and weighted average of 28.1%, a difference of 0.61%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Africa	Chilean
Minimum	12.2%	10.7%
Maximum	55.1%	47.6%
Range	42.9%	36.9%
Mean	30.1%	27.1%
Median	28.3%	28.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	26.5%	22.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	31.4%	30.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.9%	8.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.0%	7.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.9%	7.5%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Africa and Chileans by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Africa are South American Indian (28.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Arab (28.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (28.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Scandinavian (28.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Spaniard (28.0%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Kenya (28.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from the Azores (28.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Ute (28.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Indonesian (28.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Oceania (28.1%, a difference of 0.080%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Ute	99.1 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 28.2%
Chileans	98.9 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| Kenya	98.9 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| Azores	98.8 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 28.1%
Indonesians	98.8 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| Oceania	98.8 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 28.1%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	98.7 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 28.1%
Palestinians	98.5 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 28.1%
Sioux	98.3 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 28.1%
Choctaw	98.3 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| South America	98.0 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Uganda	97.7 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	97.7 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 28.0%
Tohono O'odham	97.6 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 28.0%
Spaniards	97.4 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 28.0%
Scandinavians	97.1 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	97.0 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 28.0%
Arabs	97.0 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 28.0%
South American Indians	96.9 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Africa	96.8 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 28.0%
Pakistanis	96.0 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 27.9%