Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Cajun Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,016,323 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.164 and weighted average of 27.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,693,835 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.618 and weighted average of 27.7%, a difference of 0.25%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Northern Africa	Cajun
Minimum	8.9%	6.8%
Maximum	49.2%	100.0%
Range	40.3%	93.2%
Mean	28.0%	28.1%
Median	27.6%	27.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	24.2%	24.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	31.5%	31.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.2%	6.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.3%	10.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.2%	10.7%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa and Cajuns by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (27.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Singapore (27.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Ecuadorian (27.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (27.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and Belizean (27.8%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Lebanese (27.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eritrea (27.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Belize (27.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Syrian (27.8%, a difference of 0.11%), and Iranian (27.7%, a difference of 0.11%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Pakistanis	96.0 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	95.9 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 27.9%
Central American Indians	95.9 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 27.9%
Zimbabweans	95.6 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 27.9%
Europeans	95.4 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Western Asia	93.6 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	92.8 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 27.8%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	91.8 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 27.8%
Immigrants \| Singapore	90.8 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 27.8%
Ecuadorians	90.8 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 27.8%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	90.5 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 27.8%
Belizeans	90.0 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 27.8%
Syrians	89.7 /100 \| #128	Excellent 27.8%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	89.4 /100 \| #129	Excellent 27.8%
Cajuns	87.6 /100 \| #130	Excellent 27.7%
Lebanese	87.4 /100 \| #131	Excellent 27.7%
Immigrants \| Belize	85.7 /100 \| #132	Excellent 27.7%
Iranians	85.2 /100 \| #133	Excellent 27.7%
Immigrants \| Panama	84.9 /100 \| #134	Excellent 27.7%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	84.6 /100 \| #135	Excellent 27.7%
Immigrants \| Portugal	84.1 /100 \| #136	Excellent 27.7%