Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Cajun Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,619,096 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.354 and weighted average of 28.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,693,835 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.618 and weighted average of 27.7%, a difference of 0.83%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Middle Africa	Cajun
Minimum	16.1%	6.8%
Maximum	45.8%	100.0%
Range	29.7%	93.2%
Mean	28.6%	28.1%
Median	28.2%	27.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	26.3%	24.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	30.7%	31.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.3%	6.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.7%	10.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.7%	10.7%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa and Cajuns by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Arab (28.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Scandinavian (28.0%, a difference of 0.030%), South American Indian (28.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Africa (28.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and Pakistani (27.9%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Lebanese (27.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eritrea (27.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Syrian (27.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Belizean (27.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (27.8%, a difference of 0.16%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Scandinavians	97.1 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	97.0 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 28.0%
Arabs	97.0 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 28.0%
South American Indians	96.9 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Africa	96.8 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 28.0%
Pakistanis	96.0 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	95.9 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 27.9%
Central American Indians	95.9 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 27.9%
Zimbabweans	95.6 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 27.9%
Europeans	95.4 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Western Asia	93.6 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	92.8 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 27.8%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	91.8 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 27.8%
Immigrants \| Singapore	90.8 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 27.8%
Ecuadorians	90.8 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 27.8%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	90.5 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 27.8%
Belizeans	90.0 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 27.8%
Syrians	89.7 /100 \| #128	Excellent 27.8%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	89.4 /100 \| #129	Excellent 27.8%
Cajuns	87.6 /100 \| #130	Excellent 27.7%
Lebanese	87.4 /100 \| #131	Excellent 27.7%