Fijian vs Costa Rican Family Households
COMPARE
Fijian
Costa Rican
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Fijians
Costa Ricans
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Fijian vs Costa Rican Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,947,966 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Fijians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.673 and weighted average of 65.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,469,677 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.080 and weighted average of 65.9%, a difference of 0.040%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fef64/fef6480819ec56440a634d3bbdd3668c3db31cc0" alt="Fijian vs Costa Rican Family Households"
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Fijian | Costa Rican |
Minimum | 8.8% | 41.4% |
Maximum | 91.4% | 89.7% |
Range | 82.6% | 48.2% |
Mean | 67.3% | 68.7% |
Median | 67.6% | 68.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.7% | 65.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.0% | 71.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.7% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.4% | 8.2% |
Demographics Similar to Fijians and Costa Ricans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Fijians are Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Pima (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Afghanistan (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Pima (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Indonesia (66.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 100.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |