Bolivian vs Costa Rican Family Households
COMPARE
Bolivian
Costa Rican
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Bolivians
Costa Ricans
66.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bolivian vs Costa Rican Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,628,552 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.260 and weighted average of 66.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,469,677 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.080 and weighted average of 65.9%, a difference of 0.80%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bolivian | Costa Rican |
| Minimum | 35.4% | 41.4% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 89.7% |
| Range | 64.6% | 48.2% |
| Mean | 69.6% | 68.7% |
| Median | 69.1% | 68.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.8% | 65.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 76.8% | 71.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.1% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.6% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.5% | 8.2% |
Demographics Similar to Bolivians and Costa Ricans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Immigrants from Venezuela (66.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Arapaho (66.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (66.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Navajo (66.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and Native/Alaskan (66.4%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Pima (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Indonesia (66.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Central American (66.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Danish (66.0%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Arapaho | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 66.5% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 66.5% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Navajo | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Colombians | 100.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 100.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 100.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |