Chilean vs Icelander Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Chilean
Icelander
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Chileans
Icelanders
30.7%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
79.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
30.3%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
86.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Icelander Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 245,289,700 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.644 and weighted average of 30.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 153,143,056 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.650 and weighted average of 30.3%, a difference of 1.2%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chilean | Icelander |
Minimum | 10.9% | 20.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 89.1% | 79.2% |
Mean | 40.9% | 51.6% |
Median | 32.7% | 40.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 27.2% | 31.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 44.8% | 75.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.5% | 44.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.7% | 28.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.4% | 27.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans and Icelanders by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Oceania (30.6%, a difference of 0.33%), Northern European (30.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from North America (30.6%, a difference of 0.38%), Czech (30.5%, a difference of 0.48%), and Immigrants from Uganda (30.5%, a difference of 0.55%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Immigrants from Spain (30.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (30.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (30.3%, a difference of 0.060%), New Zealander (30.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Morocco (30.4%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Icelanders | 86.0 /100 | #128 | Excellent 30.3% |
Immigrants | Spain | 85.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 30.3% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 85.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 30.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 85.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 30.3% |
New Zealanders | 85.5 /100 | #132 | Excellent 30.3% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 85.2 /100 | #133 | Excellent 30.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 85.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 30.4% |
Brazilians | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 30.4% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 30.4% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 83.9 /100 | #137 | Excellent 30.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 30.4% |
Immigrants | Canada | 83.7 /100 | #139 | Excellent 30.4% |
Swiss | 83.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 30.5% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #141 | Excellent 30.5% |
South Africans | 82.7 /100 | #142 | Excellent 30.5% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 82.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 30.5% |
Czechs | 82.1 /100 | #144 | Excellent 30.5% |
Immigrants | North America | 81.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 30.6% |
Northern Europeans | 81.4 /100 | #146 | Excellent 30.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 81.2 /100 | #147 | Excellent 30.6% |
Chileans | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 30.7% |