Immigrants from Liberia vs South American Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,222,977 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.106 and weighted average of 28.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,371,298 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of South Americans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 28.4%, a difference of 0.61%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Liberia	South American
Minimum	10.6%	12.7%
Maximum	37.5%	66.7%
Range	26.9%	53.9%
Mean	27.4%	30.1%
Median	28.0%	29.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	25.1%	26.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	30.4%	32.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.4%	6.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.7%	7.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.7%	7.5%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Liberia and South Americans by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Liberia are Chickasaw (28.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Thailand (28.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Panamanian (28.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Liberian (28.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (28.3%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Native/Alaskan (28.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Iraq (28.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Kenyan (28.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Nepal (28.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and Nicaraguan (28.4%, a difference of 0.090%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.9 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 28.4%
Nigerians	99.8 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 28.4%
Immigrants \| Nepal	99.8 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 28.4%
Immigrants \| Iraq	99.8 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 28.4%
Natives/Alaskans	99.8 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 28.4%
South Americans	99.8 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 28.4%
Kenyans	99.8 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 28.4%
Nicaraguans	99.8 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 28.4%
Costa Ricans	99.8 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 28.4%
Immigrants \| Syria	99.8 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 28.4%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	99.6 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 28.3%
Colombians	99.6 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 28.3%
Liberians	99.6 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 28.3%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	99.6 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 28.3%
Immigrants \| Thailand	99.5 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 28.2%
Immigrants \| Liberia	99.4 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 28.2%
Chickasaw	99.4 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 28.2%
Panamanians	99.3 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 28.2%
Immigrants \| Colombia	99.2 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 28.2%
Immigrants \| Nicaragua	99.1 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 28.2%
Ute	99.1 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 28.2%