South African vs Immigrants from Lithuania 2nd Grade
COMPARE
South African
Immigrants from Lithuania
2nd Grade
2nd Grade Comparison
South Africans
Immigrants from Lithuania
98.2%
2ND GRADE
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
98.2%
2ND GRADE
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
78th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Immigrants from Lithuania 2nd Grade Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,602,894 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of population with at least 2nd grade education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.434 and weighted average of 98.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,724,932 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and percentage of population with at least 2nd grade education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.491 and weighted average of 98.2%, a difference of 0.050%.
2nd Grade Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South African | Immigrants from Lithuania |
| Minimum | 96.7% | 96.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 3.3% | 3.1% |
| Mean | 99.2% | 98.9% |
| Median | 99.4% | 99.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 98.7% | 98.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 100.0% | 99.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 0.82% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.86% | 0.76% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.84% | 0.75% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans and Immigrants from Lithuania by 2nd Grade
In terms of 2nd grade, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Germany (98.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from India (98.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Cypriot (98.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Ukrainian (98.2%, a difference of 0.020%), and Zimbabwean (98.2%, a difference of 0.020%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Immigrants from Belgium (98.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Osage (98.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Cherokee (98.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from England (98.3%, a difference of 0.010%), and Icelander (98.2%, a difference of 0.010%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | 2nd Grade |
| Cherokee | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 98.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 99.4 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 98.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Osage | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Icelanders | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Delaware | 99.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.1 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Hopi | 99.1 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Potawatomi | 99.1 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Macedonians | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Ukrainians | 98.9 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Zimbabweans | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Immigrants | India | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 98.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 98.2% |
| South Africans | 98.6 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Cypriots | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 98.2% |