Chippewa vs Lumbee 2nd Grade
COMPARE
Chippewa
Lumbee
2nd Grade
2nd Grade Comparison
Chippewa
Lumbee
98.4%
2ND GRADE
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
98.4%
2ND GRADE
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Lumbee 2nd Grade Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,065,644 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population with at least 2nd grade education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180 and weighted average of 98.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,298,794 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of population with at least 2nd grade education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.077 and weighted average of 98.4%, a difference of 0.050%.
2nd Grade Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chippewa | Lumbee |
Minimum | 95.7% | 96.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 4.3% | 3.7% |
Mean | 99.3% | 98.8% |
Median | 99.4% | 98.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 99.0% | 98.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 100.0% | 99.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.0% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.88% | 1.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.88% | 1.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa and Lumbee by 2nd Grade
In terms of 2nd grade, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Latvian (98.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Italian (98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Luxembourger (98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Eastern European (98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), and Native Hawaiian (98.4%, a difference of 0.020%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Hungarian (98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Ottawa (98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Czechoslovakian (98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Northern European (98.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Native Hawaiian (98.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | 2nd Grade |
French Canadians | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 98.5% |
Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 98.5% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 98.5% |
Swiss | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 98.5% |
British | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 98.5% |
Italians | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 98.4% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 98.4% |
Chippewa | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 98.4% |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 98.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 98.4% |
Native Hawaiians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 98.4% |
Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 98.4% |
Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 98.4% |
Hungarians | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 98.4% |
Lumbee | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 98.4% |
Ottawa | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 98.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 98.4% |
Celtics | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 98.4% |
Whites/Caucasians | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 98.4% |
Estonians | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 98.4% |
Australians | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 98.4% |