Chinese vs Lumbee 2nd Grade
COMPARE
Chinese
Lumbee
2nd Grade
2nd Grade Comparison
Chinese
Lumbee
98.5%
2ND GRADE
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
98.4%
2ND GRADE
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Lumbee 2nd Grade Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,808,307 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with at least 2nd grade education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.112 and weighted average of 98.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,298,794 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of population with at least 2nd grade education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.077 and weighted average of 98.4%, a difference of 0.10%.
2nd Grade Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Lumbee |
| Minimum | 96.4% | 96.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 3.6% | 3.7% |
| Mean | 98.9% | 98.8% |
| Median | 99.0% | 98.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 98.4% | 98.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 99.5% | 99.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.86% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.85% | 1.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Lumbee by 2nd Grade
In terms of 2nd grade, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Swiss (98.5%, a difference of 0.010%), French Canadian (98.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Scandinavian (98.5%, a difference of 0.020%), British (98.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and European (98.5%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Hungarian (98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Ottawa (98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Czechoslovakian (98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Northern European (98.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Native Hawaiian (98.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | 2nd Grade |
| Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| French Canadians | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| Swiss | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| British | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| Italians | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Chippewa | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Native Hawaiians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Hungarians | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Lumbee | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Ottawa | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Celtics | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 98.4% |