Zimbabwean vs Central American Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Central American
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Zimbabweans
Central Americans
17.6%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
6.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
220th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.7%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
4.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
222nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Central American Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,204,510 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.207 and weighted average of 17.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 504,492,457 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.173 and weighted average of 17.7%, a difference of 0.22%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Central American |
| Minimum | 7.2% | 8.3% |
| Maximum | 30.8% | 27.9% |
| Range | 23.7% | 19.6% |
| Mean | 16.8% | 17.0% |
| Median | 17.1% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.6% | 16.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.2% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 1.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Central Americans by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Moroccan (17.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (17.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Icelander (17.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Salvadoran (17.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and Okinawan (17.6%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Alsatian (17.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Moroccan (17.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Fijian (17.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Vietnamese (17.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (17.6%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Taiwanese | 7.7 /100 | #211 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 7.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Hawaiians | 7.2 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 7.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 6.9 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Okinawans | 6.8 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Salvadorans | 6.7 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Icelanders | 6.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 6.3 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Zimbabweans | 6.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Moroccans | 5.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Central Americans | 4.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Alsatians | 4.5 /100 | #223 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Fijians | 3.4 /100 | #224 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Vietnamese | 3.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Marshallese | 2.7 /100 | #226 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 2.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 2.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 2.2 /100 | #229 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Mongolians | 2.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Guatemalans | 2.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 17.8% |