Zimbabwean vs Cajun Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Cajun
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Zimbabweans
Cajuns
17.6%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
6.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
220th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.8%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
1.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Cajun Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,204,510 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.207 and weighted average of 17.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,701,580 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149 and weighted average of 17.8%, a difference of 1.0%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Cajun |
| Minimum | 7.2% | 7.5% |
| Maximum | 30.8% | 28.5% |
| Range | 23.7% | 20.9% |
| Mean | 16.8% | 17.8% |
| Median | 17.1% | 17.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.6% | 16.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.2% | 19.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Cajuns by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Moroccan (17.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (17.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Central American (17.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Alsatian (17.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and Fijian (17.7%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Cheyenne (17.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Mexico (17.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Iraq (17.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Osage (17.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and Spanish American Indian (17.8%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 6.3 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Zimbabweans | 6.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Moroccans | 5.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Central Americans | 4.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Alsatians | 4.5 /100 | #223 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Fijians | 3.4 /100 | #224 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Vietnamese | 3.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Marshallese | 2.7 /100 | #226 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 2.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 2.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 2.2 /100 | #229 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Mongolians | 2.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Guatemalans | 2.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Tongans | 2.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Panamanians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Osage | 2.0 /100 | #234 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Spanish American Indians | 2.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 1.8 /100 | #236 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 1.8 /100 | #237 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Cheyenne | 1.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Cajuns | 1.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 17.8% |