Sudanese vs Cypriot Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Sudanese
Cypriot
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Sudanese
Cypriots
2.2%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese vs Cypriot Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,094,977 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.052 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,833,470 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cypriots and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.193 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 2.3%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sudanese | Cypriot |
| Minimum | 0.62% | 0.60% |
| Maximum | 4.3% | 5.7% |
| Range | 3.7% | 5.1% |
| Mean | 2.1% | 2.1% |
| Median | 2.1% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.78% | 0.80% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.67% | 0.84% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.67% | 0.83% |
Demographics Similar to Sudanese and Cypriots by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from South Central Asia (2.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Ethiopian (2.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Luxembourger (2.2%, a difference of 0.33%), and Okinawan (2.2%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cypriots are Turkish (2.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (2.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Venezuelan (2.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Cambodian (2.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Venezuela (2.2%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 2.2% |