Sri Lankan vs Immigrants from Chile Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Immigrants from Chile
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Sri Lankans
Immigrants from Chile
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Immigrants from Chile Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,321,822 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.442 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,629,833 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.824 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 1.6%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sri Lankan | Immigrants from Chile |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 20.4% | 23.8% |
| Range | 17.8% | 21.4% |
| Mean | 6.2% | 6.8% |
| Median | 5.5% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 7.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.0% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans and Immigrants from Chile by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from Uganda (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Peruvian (5.7%, a difference of 0.43%), Sierra Leonean (5.7%, a difference of 0.67%), Immigrants from Peru (5.7%, a difference of 0.75%), and Brazilian (5.7%, a difference of 0.78%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Latvian (5.7%, a difference of 0.060%), South American (5.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Ugandan (5.7%, a difference of 0.33%), Eastern European (5.7%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Jordan (5.7%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |