Sri Lankan vs Immigrants from Uganda Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Immigrants from Uganda
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Sri Lankans
Immigrants from Uganda
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
67th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Immigrants from Uganda Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,321,822 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.442 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,972,414 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 0.030%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sri Lankan | Immigrants from Uganda |
Minimum | 2.6% | 0.18% |
Maximum | 20.4% | 15.5% |
Range | 17.8% | 15.3% |
Mean | 6.2% | 5.8% |
Median | 5.5% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 7.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.0% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans and Immigrants from Uganda by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Israeli (5.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Switzerland (5.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Laotian (5.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from France (5.6%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Spain (5.6%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uganda are Israeli (5.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Switzerland (5.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Laotian (5.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from France (5.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Spain (5.6%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | France | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |