South African vs Immigrants from Uruguay Female Disability
COMPARE
South African
Immigrants from Uruguay
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
South Africans
Immigrants from Uruguay
11.8%
FEMALE DISABILITY
97.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.7%
FEMALE DISABILITY
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Immigrants from Uruguay Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,588,649 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.895 and weighted average of 11.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,256,548 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.369 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 0.41%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | South African | Immigrants from Uruguay |
Minimum | 5.3% | 8.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 29.1% |
Range | 94.7% | 21.1% |
Mean | 15.3% | 14.4% |
Median | 11.1% | 11.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.1% | 19.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 9.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.9% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.6% | 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans and Immigrants from Uruguay by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Brazilian (11.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Belarus (11.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (11.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Morocco (11.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and Costa Rican (11.7%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uruguay are Immigrants from Costa Rica (11.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (11.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Philippines (11.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (11.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Western Asia (11.7%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Koreans | 99.0 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Uruguayans | 98.8 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.6 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 98.5 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 98.4 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 98.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 98.3 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 98.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Australians | 98.3 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Greece | 98.2 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Latvians | 98.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.7% |
New Zealanders | 98.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 98.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Soviet Union | 98.1 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Costa Ricans | 98.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 97.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 97.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.8% |
South Africans | 97.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Brazilians | 97.7 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 97.6 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 11.8% |