South African vs Ecuadorian Disability Age 5 to 17
COMPARE
South African
 Ecuadorian
 Disability Age 5 to 17
Disability Age 5 to 17 Comparison
South Africans
Ecuadorians
5.5%
DISABILITY AGE 5 TO 17
73.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.5%
DISABILITY AGE 5 TO 17
79.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Ecuadorian Disability Age 5 to 17 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,855,258 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 5 and 17 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.437 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 315,899,023 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 5 and 17 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.009 and weighted average of 5.5%, a difference of 0.45%.
 
Disability Age 5 to 17 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South African | Ecuadorian | 
| Minimum | 2.0% | 0.57% | 
| Maximum | 14.0% | 12.5% | 
| Range | 12.0% | 11.9% | 
| Mean | 6.6% | 5.3% | 
| Median | 5.6% | 5.4% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 3.9% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 6.6% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 2.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 2.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 2.2% | 
Demographics Similar to South Africans and Ecuadorians by Disability Age 5 to 17
In terms of disability age 5 to 17, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (5.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Nepal (5.5%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.5%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and Hawaiian (5.5%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Ute (5.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Australian (5.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Estonian (5.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Ecuador (5.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and Hawaiian (5.5%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 5 to 17 | 
| Albanians | 83.7 /100 | #146 | Excellent 5.5% | 
| Immigrants | Albania | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 5.5% | 
| Samoans | 81.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 5.5% | 
| Central Americans | 81.6 /100 | #149 | Excellent 5.5% | 
| Guatemalans | 81.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 5.5% | 
| Estonians | 80.8 /100 | #151 | Excellent 5.5% | 
| Ute | 80.6 /100 | #152 | Excellent 5.5% | 
| Ecuadorians | 79.7 /100 | #153 | Good 5.5% | 
| Australians | 78.8 /100 | #154 | Good 5.5% | 
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 78.3 /100 | #155 | Good 5.5% | 
| Hawaiians | 78.0 /100 | #156 | Good 5.5% | 
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 77.9 /100 | #157 | Good 5.5% | 
| Immigrants | Nepal | 77.1 /100 | #158 | Good 5.5% | 
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 75.3 /100 | #159 | Good 5.5% | 
| South Africans | 73.3 /100 | #160 | Good 5.5% | 
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 69.1 /100 | #161 | Good 5.5% | 
| Zimbabweans | 67.2 /100 | #162 | Good 5.5% | 
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 64.0 /100 | #163 | Good 5.6% | 
| Immigrants | Scotland | 61.9 /100 | #164 | Good 5.6% | 
| Lebanese | 61.4 /100 | #165 | Good 5.6% | 
| Greeks | 60.6 /100 | #166 | Good 5.6% |