Scotch-Irish vs Yakama Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Scotch-Irish
 Yakama
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Scotch-Irish
Yakama
6.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
290th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
286th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scotch-Irish vs Yakama Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 548,439,452 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.327 and weighted average of 6.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,917,759 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yakama and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.046 and weighted average of 6.8%, a difference of 0.77%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scotch-Irish | Yakama | 
| Minimum | 0.57% | 4.2% | 
| Maximum | 50.0% | 16.3% | 
| Range | 49.4% | 12.0% | 
| Mean | 12.4% | 8.5% | 
| Median | 9.8% | 7.3% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 6.5% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.2% | 9.5% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 3.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.3% | 2.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.2% | 2.9% | 
Demographics Similar to Scotch-Irish and Yakama by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Immigrants from Dominica (6.9%, a difference of 0.030%), West Indian (6.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Cheyenne (6.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Nonimmigrants (6.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (6.9%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Fijian (6.8%, a difference of 0.040%), U.S. Virgin Islander (6.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Jamaica (6.8%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Barbados (6.8%, a difference of 0.52%), and Nonimmigrants (6.9%, a difference of 0.60%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #278  | Tragic 6.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #279  | Tragic 6.7%  | 
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #280  | Tragic 6.8%  | 
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #281  | Tragic 6.8%  | 
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #282  | Tragic 6.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #283  | Tragic 6.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #284  | Tragic 6.8%  | 
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #285  | Tragic 6.8%  | 
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #286  | Tragic 6.8%  | 
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #287  | Tragic 6.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #288  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #289  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #290  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #291  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #292  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #293  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #294  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #295  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #296  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #298  | Tragic 6.9%  |