Puget Sound Salish vs Yakama Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Puget Sound Salish
Yakama
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Puget Sound Salish
Yakama
6.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
299th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
286th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Puget Sound Salish vs Yakama Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,152,398 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.029 and weighted average of 6.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,917,759 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yakama and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.046 and weighted average of 6.8%, a difference of 2.0%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Puget Sound Salish | Yakama |
| Minimum | 4.5% | 4.2% |
| Maximum | 34.2% | 16.3% |
| Range | 29.7% | 12.0% |
| Mean | 8.5% | 8.5% |
| Median | 7.2% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.4% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Puget Sound Salish and Yakama by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Marshallese (6.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Grenada (6.9%, a difference of 0.13%), French American Indian (6.9%, a difference of 0.14%), British West Indian (7.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Armenia (7.0%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Fijian (6.8%, a difference of 0.040%), U.S. Virgin Islander (6.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Jamaica (6.8%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Barbados (6.8%, a difference of 0.52%), and Nonimmigrants (6.9%, a difference of 0.60%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.8% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.9% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.9% |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.9% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% |