Pakistani vs Cape Verdean Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Pakistani
Cape Verdean
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Pakistanis
Cape Verdeans
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
11.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
12.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pakistani vs Cape Verdean Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 335,217,185 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.407 and weighted average of 3.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,552,896 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.610 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 0.25%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pakistani | Cape Verdean |
| Minimum | 0.88% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 14.1% | 14.5% |
| Range | 13.2% | 13.2% |
| Mean | 4.4% | 3.8% |
| Median | 3.5% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.0% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.4% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Pakistanis and Cape Verdeans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Immigrants from Iraq (3.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Romanian (3.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Hungary (3.1%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Latvia (3.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and Australian (3.2%, a difference of 0.77%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cape Verdeans are Romanian (3.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Hungary (3.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Latvia (3.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Iraq (3.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and Hispanic or Latino (3.1%, a difference of 0.55%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Iraqis | 19.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 16.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 16.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 3.1% |
| Alsatians | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 3.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 15.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 3.1% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% |
| Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% |
| Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% |
| Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
| New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |