New Zealander vs Fijian Disability Age Under 5
COMPARE
New Zealander
Fijian
Disability Age Under 5
Disability Age Under 5 Comparison
New Zealanders
Fijians
1.2%
DISABILITY AGE UNDER 5
81.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
1.2%
DISABILITY AGE UNDER 5
84.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
New Zealander vs Fijian Disability Age Under 5 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,962,050 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of population with a disability under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.558 and weighted average of 1.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,950,279 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Fijians and percentage of population with a disability under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.028 and weighted average of 1.2%, a difference of 0.55%.
Disability Age Under 5 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | New Zealander | Fijian |
| Minimum | 0.60% | 0.50% |
| Maximum | 5.2% | 8.7% |
| Range | 4.6% | 8.2% |
| Mean | 2.2% | 2.7% |
| Median | 1.6% | 1.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.2% | 0.81% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.3% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders and Fijians by Disability Age Under 5
In terms of disability age under 5, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Somali (1.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Honduras (1.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (1.2%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (1.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Colombia (1.2%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Fijians are Moroccan (1.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Argentinean (1.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (1.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (1.2%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Spain (1.2%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age Under 5 |
| Immigrants | Romania | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 1.2% |
| Immigrants | France | 88.4 /100 | #128 | Excellent 1.2% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 88.0 /100 | #129 | Excellent 1.2% |
| Koreans | 87.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 1.2% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 87.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 1.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 87.3 /100 | #132 | Excellent 1.2% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 86.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 1.2% |
| Argentineans | 85.7 /100 | #134 | Excellent 1.2% |
| Fijians | 84.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 1.2% |
| Moroccans | 83.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 1.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 83.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 1.2% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 82.8 /100 | #138 | Excellent 1.2% |
| New Zealanders | 81.4 /100 | #139 | Excellent 1.2% |
| Somalis | 80.8 /100 | #140 | Excellent 1.2% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 80.4 /100 | #141 | Excellent 1.2% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 79.3 /100 | #142 | Good 1.2% |
| Alsatians | 79.3 /100 | #143 | Good 1.2% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 79.3 /100 | #144 | Good 1.2% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 77.9 /100 | #145 | Good 1.2% |
| Samoans | 77.7 /100 | #146 | Good 1.2% |
| Icelanders | 76.3 /100 | #147 | Good 1.2% |