Mongolian vs Ethiopian Female Disability
COMPARE
Mongolian
 Ethiopian
 Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Mongolians
Ethiopians
11.2%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
40th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mongolian vs Ethiopian Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,358,639 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.473 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,237,211 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.365 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 0.27%.
 
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Mongolian | Ethiopian | 
| Minimum | 1.6% | 3.5% | 
| Maximum | 26.2% | 17.3% | 
| Range | 24.6% | 13.8% | 
| Mean | 11.8% | 10.2% | 
| Median | 10.9% | 10.3% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.9% | 8.9% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.0% | 11.5% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 2.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 2.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 2.5% | 
Demographics Similar to Mongolians and Ethiopians by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Paraguayan (11.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Lithuania (11.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Afghan (11.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (11.2%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Cypriot (11.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (11.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Japan (11.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Indonesia (11.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (11.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability | 
| Egyptians | 100.0 /100 | #28  | Exceptional 11.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #29  | Exceptional 11.1%  | 
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #30  | Exceptional 11.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #31  | Exceptional 11.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32  | Exceptional 11.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #33  | Exceptional 11.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #34  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #35  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #36  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #37  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #38  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #39  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Mongolians | 100.0 /100 | #40  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Paraguayans | 100.0 /100 | #41  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Israelis | 100.0 /100 | #42  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #43  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #44  | Exceptional 11.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Sweden | 100.0 /100 | #45  | Exceptional 11.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #46  | Exceptional 11.3%  | 
| Jordanians | 100.0 /100 | #47  | Exceptional 11.3%  | 
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #48  | Exceptional 11.3%  |