Immigrants from Japan vs Ethiopian Female Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Japan
Ethiopian
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Japan
Ethiopians
11.2%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Japan vs Ethiopian Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 340,141,338 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,237,211 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.365 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 0.080%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Japan | Ethiopian |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 3.5% |
| Maximum | 54.8% | 17.3% |
| Range | 52.9% | 13.8% |
| Mean | 13.2% | 10.2% |
| Median | 10.6% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.4% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.2% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Japan and Ethiopians by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Cypriot (11.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Indonesia (11.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Lithuania (11.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and Mongolian (11.2%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Cypriot (11.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (11.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Indonesia (11.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Lithuania (11.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Mongolian (11.2%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Argentineans | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Egyptians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Mongolians | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Paraguayans | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Israelis | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.3% |