Mongolian vs Immigrants from Sweden Female Disability
COMPARE
Mongolian
Immigrants from Sweden
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Mongolians
Immigrants from Sweden
11.2%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
40th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mongolian vs Immigrants from Sweden Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,358,639 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.473 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,745,093 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sweden and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.209 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 0.38%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Mongolian | Immigrants from Sweden |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 0.98% |
| Maximum | 26.2% | 28.6% |
| Range | 24.6% | 27.6% |
| Mean | 11.8% | 11.2% |
| Median | 10.9% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.9% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.0% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Mongolians and Immigrants from Sweden by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Paraguayan (11.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Lithuania (11.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Afghan (11.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (11.2%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sweden are Cambodian (11.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Nepal (11.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Jordanian (11.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Zimbabwean (11.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Tongan (11.3%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Mongolians | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Paraguayans | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Israelis | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Jordanians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 11.3% |