Lumbee vs Navajo Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Lumbee
Navajo
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Lumbee
Navajo
4.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.6%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Navajo Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,274,524 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.208 and weighted average of 4.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,724,902 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Navajo and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.045 and weighted average of 4.6%, a difference of 12.8%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee | Navajo |
| Minimum | 0.45% | 0.66% |
| Maximum | 9.7% | 23.2% |
| Range | 9.2% | 22.6% |
| Mean | 4.9% | 6.3% |
| Median | 4.9% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.4% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.8% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.8% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Lumbee and Navajo by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Potawatomi (4.1%, a difference of 0.29%), Osage (4.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Apache (4.1%, a difference of 0.39%), Arapaho (4.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and Tohono O'odham (4.2%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 0.33%), Tsimshian (4.7%, a difference of 1.5%), Inupiat (4.7%, a difference of 1.8%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 3.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |