Latvian vs Guyanese Disability
COMPARE
Latvian
 Guyanese
 Disability
Disability Comparison
Latvians
Guyanese
11.4%
DISABILITY
89.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
130th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
DISABILITY
94.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Guyanese Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,718,032 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.518 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 176,904,345 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Guyanese and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.135 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 0.81%.
 
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Latvian | Guyanese | 
| Minimum | 2.6% | 6.2% | 
| Maximum | 33.8% | 17.6% | 
| Range | 31.2% | 11.4% | 
| Mean | 13.9% | 11.3% | 
| Median | 12.6% | 11.3% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 9.9% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.4% | 12.5% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 2.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 2.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 2.3% | 
Demographics Similar to Latvians and Guyanese by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Immigrants from Croatia (11.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Macedonian (11.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Italy (11.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Europe (11.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Latvia (11.4%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guyanese are Immigrants from Syria (11.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Philippines (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (11.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (11.3%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability | 
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 95.4 /100 | #111  | Exceptional 11.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 94.9 /100 | #112  | Exceptional 11.3%  | 
| Guyanese | 94.7 /100 | #113  | Exceptional 11.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Syria | 94.7 /100 | #114  | Exceptional 11.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Philippines | 94.6 /100 | #115  | Exceptional 11.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 94.1 /100 | #116  | Exceptional 11.3%  | 
| Luxembourgers | 93.9 /100 | #117  | Exceptional 11.3%  | 
| Koreans | 93.8 /100 | #118  | Exceptional 11.3%  | 
| Central Americans | 93.5 /100 | #119  | Exceptional 11.4%  | 
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.5 /100 | #120  | Exceptional 11.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 93.4 /100 | #121  | Exceptional 11.4%  | 
| Brazilians | 93.3 /100 | #122  | Exceptional 11.4%  | 
| South Africans | 92.3 /100 | #123  | Exceptional 11.4%  | 
| South American Indians | 92.2 /100 | #124  | Exceptional 11.4%  | 
| Costa Ricans | 91.9 /100 | #125  | Exceptional 11.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Latvia | 90.9 /100 | #126  | Exceptional 11.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Italy | 90.4 /100 | #127  | Exceptional 11.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Europe | 90.4 /100 | #128  | Exceptional 11.4%  | 
| Macedonians | 90.3 /100 | #129  | Exceptional 11.4%  | 
| Latvians | 89.8 /100 | #130  | Excellent 11.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Croatia | 89.8 /100 | #131  | Excellent 11.4%  |