Cypriot vs Turkish Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Cypriot
Turkish
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Cypriots
Turks
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cypriot vs Turkish Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,870,126 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cypriots and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.026 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,801,732 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.130 and weighted average of 5.5%, a difference of 0.010%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cypriot | Turkish |
| Minimum | 0.38% | 0.92% |
| Maximum | 12.7% | 11.5% |
| Range | 12.3% | 10.6% |
| Mean | 5.3% | 5.7% |
| Median | 5.1% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.8% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 2.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Cypriots and Turks by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Cypriots are Immigrants from Malaysia (5.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Afghan (5.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Asia (5.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Pakistan (5.5%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Malaysia (5.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Afghan (5.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Asia (5.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Pakistan (5.5%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Argentineans | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 5.6% |