Japanese vs Immigrants from Ukraine Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Japanese
Immigrants from Ukraine
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Japanese
Immigrants from Ukraine
3.0%
HEARING DISABILITY
46.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.0%
HEARING DISABILITY
56.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese vs Immigrants from Ukraine Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,105,269 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.363 and weighted average of 3.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 289,631,097 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ukraine and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.927 and weighted average of 3.0%, a difference of 1.0%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Japanese | Immigrants from Ukraine |
| Minimum | 0.75% | 0.79% |
| Maximum | 11.9% | 48.1% |
| Range | 11.1% | 47.4% |
| Mean | 3.9% | 4.1% |
| Median | 3.1% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.0% | 0.84% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 7.1% |
Demographics Similar to Japanese and Immigrants from Ukraine by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Philippines (3.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Panamanian (3.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Romania (3.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Moldova (3.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Sweden (3.0%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ukraine are Immigrants from Cabo Verde (3.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Armenian (3.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Arab (3.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Greece (3.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (3.0%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 62.9 /100 | #166 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #167 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 57.9 /100 | #168 | Average 3.0% |
| Arabs | 57.6 /100 | #169 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 56.9 /100 | #170 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 56.6 /100 | #171 | Average 3.0% |
| Armenians | 56.0 /100 | #172 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 51.1 /100 | #173 | Average 3.0% |
| Indonesians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 48.4 /100 | #175 | Average 3.0% |
| Panamanians | 47.0 /100 | #176 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 46.4 /100 | #177 | Average 3.0% |
| Japanese | 46.0 /100 | #178 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 43.1 /100 | #179 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 42.4 /100 | #180 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 41.5 /100 | #181 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 41.1 /100 | #182 | Average 3.0% |
| Bulgarians | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 37.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 3.0% |