Iroquois vs Kenyan Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Iroquois
Kenyan
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Iroquois
Kenyans
18.2%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.1%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
286th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Kenyan Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,276,810 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.608 and weighted average of 18.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,212,811 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Kenyans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.517 and weighted average of 18.1%, a difference of 0.29%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iroquois | Kenyan |
| Minimum | 8.7% | 3.7% |
| Maximum | 66.7% | 32.0% |
| Range | 58.0% | 28.2% |
| Mean | 20.3% | 17.4% |
| Median | 17.8% | 17.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.7% | 15.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.6% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.4% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Kenyans by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Central American Indian (18.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Ottawa (18.2%, a difference of 0.070%), British West Indian (18.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Africa (18.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and Native/Alaskan (18.1%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Kenyans are Bermudan (18.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Dutch West Indian (18.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Uganda (18.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from West Indies (18.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Native/Alaskan (18.1%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Chippewa | 0.1 /100 | #279 | Tragic 18.1% |
| West Indians | 0.1 /100 | #280 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Yakama | 0.1 /100 | #281 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 0.1 /100 | #282 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Nigerians | 0.1 /100 | #283 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 0.1 /100 | #284 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Bermudans | 0.1 /100 | #285 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Kenyans | 0.1 /100 | #286 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.1 /100 | #287 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #288 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.1 /100 | #289 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 0.1 /100 | #290 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #291 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #292 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Central American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #293 | Tragic 18.2% |
| British West Indians | 0.1 /100 | #294 | Tragic 18.2% |
| German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Japanese | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 18.3% |