Immigrants from Serbia vs Latvian Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Serbia
 Latvian
 Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Serbia
Latvians
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Serbia vs Latvian Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,686,608 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.098 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,536,730 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.134 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 0.19%.
 
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Serbia | Latvian | 
| Minimum | 0.16% | 0.23% | 
| Maximum | 4.6% | 10.4% | 
| Range | 4.4% | 10.1% | 
| Mean | 2.1% | 2.8% | 
| Median | 2.2% | 2.2% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 1.2% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.4% | 2.8% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.61% | 1.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.82% | 2.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.82% | 2.6% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Serbia and Latvians by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Serbia are Kenyan (2.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Australian (2.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Argentinean (2.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from France (2.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.3%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Immigrants from Brazil (2.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Malaysia (2.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Kenyan (2.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Jordanian (2.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and Australian (2.3%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability | 
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #40  | Exceptional 2.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Sudan | 99.8 /100 | #41  | Exceptional 2.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Uganda | 99.8 /100 | #42  | Exceptional 2.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.8 /100 | #43  | Exceptional 2.3%  | 
| Immigrants | South Africa | 99.8 /100 | #44  | Exceptional 2.3%  | 
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #45  | Exceptional 2.3%  | 
| Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #46  | Exceptional 2.3%  | 
| Jordanians | 99.7 /100 | #47  | Exceptional 2.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.7 /100 | #48  | Exceptional 2.3%  | 
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #49  | Exceptional 2.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.7 /100 | #50  | Exceptional 2.3%  | 
| Kenyans | 99.7 /100 | #51  | Exceptional 2.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.6 /100 | #52  | Exceptional 2.3%  | 
| Australians | 99.6 /100 | #53  | Exceptional 2.3%  | 
| Argentineans | 99.6 /100 | #54  | Exceptional 2.3%  | 
| Immigrants | France | 99.6 /100 | #55  | Exceptional 2.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.6 /100 | #56  | Exceptional 2.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.6 /100 | #57  | Exceptional 2.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.6 /100 | #58  | Exceptional 2.3%  | 
| New Zealanders | 99.5 /100 | #59  | Exceptional 2.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #60  | Exceptional 2.3%  |