Immigrants from Norway vs Ghanaian Female Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Norway
Ghanaian
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Norway
Ghanaians
11.9%
FEMALE DISABILITY
93.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
FEMALE DISABILITY
76.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Norway vs Ghanaian Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,702,841 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.841 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,696,570 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.001 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 1.5%.

Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Norway | Ghanaian |
Minimum | 1.5% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 68.1% | 21.9% |
Range | 66.6% | 20.2% |
Mean | 16.0% | 11.7% |
Median | 12.0% | 11.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.8% | 12.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.1% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.8% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Norway and Ghanaians by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Ugandan (11.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Ecuadorian (11.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Hungary (11.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Romanian (11.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Ecuador (11.9%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are Syrian (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Sudanese (12.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Scotland (12.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Moroccan (12.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and Icelander (12.0%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Ugandans | 94.0 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 93.8 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Ecuadorians | 93.4 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 92.8 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Romanians | 91.6 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 91.5 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 90.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 89.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 11.9% |
Immigrants | Austria | 87.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 12.0% |
Estonians | 87.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 12.0% |
Pakistanis | 84.6 /100 | #146 | Excellent 12.0% |
Nigerians | 84.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 12.0% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 83.1 /100 | #148 | Excellent 12.0% |
Greeks | 82.0 /100 | #149 | Excellent 12.0% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 81.4 /100 | #150 | Excellent 12.0% |
Icelanders | 80.7 /100 | #151 | Excellent 12.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 79.3 /100 | #152 | Good 12.0% |
Sudanese | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 12.0% |
Syrians | 76.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |
Ghanaians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 12.1% |
Moroccans | 72.9 /100 | #156 | Good 12.1% |