Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Zimbabwean Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Zimbabwean
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Zimbabweans
10.4%
MALE DISABILITY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
61st/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
MALE DISABILITY
98.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
79th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Zimbabwean Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,185,016 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.639 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,206,379 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.392 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 1.6%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 5.1% | 3.1% |
| Maximum | 47.8% | 28.1% |
| Range | 42.7% | 25.0% |
| Mean | 12.1% | 11.3% |
| Median | 10.0% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.0% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.1% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.1% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.1% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa and Zimbabweans by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Immigrants from Colombia (10.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Ecuador (10.4%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Belarus (10.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Jordanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Grenada (10.5%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Jordan (10.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Russia (10.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Laotian (10.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (10.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and Sierra Leonean (10.5%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 99.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 99.3 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Jordanians | 99.3 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 99.2 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Guyanese | 99.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.2 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Colombians | 99.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 99.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.0 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 98.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 98.7 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Laotians | 98.6 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 98.6 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Zimbabweans | 98.4 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 98.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.6% |