Immigrants from Morocco vs New Zealander Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Morocco
New Zealander
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Morocco
New Zealanders
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
85.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
88.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Morocco vs New Zealander Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,891,599 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Morocco and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,891,715 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.157 and weighted average of 2.1%, a difference of 0.42%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Morocco | New Zealander |
| Minimum | 0.29% | 0.22% |
| Maximum | 5.6% | 6.6% |
| Range | 5.3% | 6.4% |
| Mean | 2.1% | 2.2% |
| Median | 2.1% | 1.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 1.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.4% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.61% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 1.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Morocco and New Zealanders by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Morocco are Immigrants from Netherlands (2.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Sierra Leonean (2.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Arab (2.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Czech (2.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (2.1%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Hungary (2.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Cameroon (2.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Syrian (2.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Chile (2.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 89.8 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 89.5 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Sudanese | 89.2 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 89.0 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 88.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 88.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.1% |
| New Zealanders | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Syrians | 87.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Venezuelans | 87.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Vietnamese | 86.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Czechs | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 86.3 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Arabs | 86.3 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 85.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 84.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 84.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.1% |
| South Americans | 82.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 82.8 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Ukrainians | 81.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 81.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 2.1% |