Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Swiss Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Swiss
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Swiss
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
77th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
96.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Swiss Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,614,589 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.174 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,154,677 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.281 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 1.6%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Swiss |
| Minimum | 0.061% | 0.66% |
| Maximum | 6.9% | 9.1% |
| Range | 6.8% | 8.4% |
| Mean | 2.4% | 2.7% |
| Median | 2.3% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 1.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.6% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.73% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 1.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa and Swiss by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Immigrants from Ireland (2.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Chilean (2.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Ugandan (2.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Denmark (2.3%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Immigrants from Chile (2.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Asia (2.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Macedonian (2.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Latvia (2.4%, a difference of 0.16%), and Icelander (2.4%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 99.0 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.0 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Chileans | 98.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Ugandans | 98.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Indians (Asian) | 98.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 98.7 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 98.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Lithuanians | 98.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 98.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 97.7 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Icelanders | 97.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Macedonians | 96.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 96.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 96.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Swiss | 96.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 2.4% |