Immigrants from Lithuania vs Egyptian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lithuania
 Egyptian
 Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Lithuania
Egyptians
1.9%
VISION DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
1.9%
VISION DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
29th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Egyptian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,709,578 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.405 and weighted average of 1.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,791,971 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.379 and weighted average of 1.9%, a difference of 0.50%.
 
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Lithuania | Egyptian | 
| Minimum | 0.53% | 0.14% | 
| Maximum | 3.1% | 4.7% | 
| Range | 2.6% | 4.6% | 
| Mean | 1.7% | 1.9% | 
| Median | 1.7% | 1.8% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.3% | 1.5% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.0% | 2.0% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.69% | 0.54% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.59% | 0.83% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.58% | 0.82% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania and Egyptians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Bulgarian (1.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Japan (1.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Asia (1.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Taiwanese (1.9%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (1.9%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Immigrants from Nepal (1.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Malaysia (1.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Taiwanese (1.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Mongolian (1.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Japan (1.9%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #16  | Exceptional 1.8%  | 
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #17  | Exceptional 1.8%  | 
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #18  | Exceptional 1.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #19  | Exceptional 1.9%  | 
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #20  | Exceptional 1.9%  | 
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #21  | Exceptional 1.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22  | Exceptional 1.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #23  | Exceptional 1.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #24  | Exceptional 1.9%  | 
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #25  | Exceptional 1.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #26  | Exceptional 1.9%  | 
| Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #27  | Exceptional 1.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.9 /100 | #28  | Exceptional 1.9%  | 
| Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #29  | Exceptional 1.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.9 /100 | #30  | Exceptional 1.9%  | 
| Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #31  | Exceptional 1.9%  | 
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #32  | Exceptional 1.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.9 /100 | #33  | Exceptional 1.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.8 /100 | #34  | Exceptional 1.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #35  | Exceptional 1.9%  | 
| Cambodians | 99.8 /100 | #36  | Exceptional 2.0%  |