Immigrants from Lithuania vs Ecuadorian Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lithuania
 Ecuadorian
 Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Lithuania
Ecuadorians
10.5%
MALE DISABILITY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
73rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.5%
MALE DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
69th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Ecuadorian Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,723,039 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.468 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,801,764 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.079 and weighted average of 10.5%, a difference of 0.41%.
 
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Lithuania | Ecuadorian | 
| Minimum | 4.7% | 2.6% | 
| Maximum | 17.2% | 19.6% | 
| Range | 12.5% | 17.0% | 
| Mean | 10.7% | 9.9% | 
| Median | 10.5% | 9.5% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.6% | 8.2% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 10.8% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 2.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 3.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 3.2% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania and Ecuadorians by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Immigrants from Serbia (10.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Cameroon (10.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Lebanon (10.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Sierra Leonean (10.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Bulgaria (10.5%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Colombian (10.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Grenada (10.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Guyanese (10.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and Jordanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability | 
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.4% | 
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 99.3 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.4% | 
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.4% | 
| Jordanians | 99.3 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.5% | 
| Immigrants | Grenada | 99.2 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.5% | 
| Guyanese | 99.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.5% | 
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.2 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.5% | 
| Colombians | 99.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 10.5% | 
| Ecuadorians | 99.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 10.5% | 
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.5% | 
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.0 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.5% | 
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.5% | 
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 98.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.5% | 
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.5% | 
| Sierra Leoneans | 98.7 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.5% | 
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.5% | 
| Laotians | 98.6 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.6% | 
| Immigrants | Russia | 98.6 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.6% | 
| Zimbabweans | 98.4 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.6% | 
| Immigrants | Jordan | 98.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.6% | 
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.3 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.6% |