Immigrants from Lithuania vs Czech Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lithuania
Czech
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Lithuania
Czechs
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Czech Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,698,570 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.044 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,678,458 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.424 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 0.83%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Lithuania | Czech |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 0.83% |
| Maximum | 2.9% | 9.4% |
| Range | 1.7% | 8.5% |
| Mean | 2.1% | 2.9% |
| Median | 2.2% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.4% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.43% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.43% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.42% | 1.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania and Czechs by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Immigrants from Australia (2.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Turkey (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Korea (2.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Sweden (2.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (2.3%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Norwegian (2.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from South Africa (2.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Pakistan (2.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Uganda (2.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and Jordanian (2.3%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Danes | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Jordanians | 99.7 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Kenyans | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.3% |