Immigrants from Israel vs Burmese Female Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Israel
Burmese
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Israel
Burmese
10.7%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Israel vs Burmese Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,030,994 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.587 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 465,299,673 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.055 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 0.62%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Israel | Burmese |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 36.7% | 34.5% |
| Range | 35.2% | 32.2% |
| Mean | 10.2% | 9.7% |
| Median | 9.8% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.4% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.2% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Israel and Burmese by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from China (10.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Korea (10.6%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (10.6%, a difference of 0.59%), and Okinawan (10.8%, a difference of 0.69%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Okinawan (10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Indian (Asian) (10.8%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from China (10.7%, a difference of 0.51%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (10.7%, a difference of 0.54%), and Immigrants from Iran (10.8%, a difference of 0.77%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Venezuelans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.0% |