Immigrants from Israel vs Thai Female Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Israel
Thai
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Israel
Thais
10.7%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Israel vs Thai Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,030,994 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.587 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 475,795,002 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Thais and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.471 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 5.0%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Israel | Thai |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 36.7% | 14.9% |
| Range | 35.2% | 13.7% |
| Mean | 10.2% | 8.5% |
| Median | 9.8% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.4% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.2% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Israel and Thais by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from China (10.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Korea (10.6%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (10.6%, a difference of 0.59%), and Burmese (10.7%, a difference of 0.62%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Immigrants from Bolivia (10.3%, a difference of 0.82%), Immigrants from Taiwan (10.1%, a difference of 0.88%), Filipino (10.1%, a difference of 1.1%), Bolivian (10.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and Immigrants from India (10.0%, a difference of 2.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.9% |